College Football Schedule and Projections
2026 · Week 7 · 116 games
Updates when a new forecast is published
Last updated:
Model lines are quoted for the home team: a negative line means the model favors the home side. Pure is the model's own line. Model Line includes historical market information and blends in the current market at a capped weight when available.
Picks show the line and odds frozen when recommended, not a live quote. No Play means the market did not qualify. View recorded decisions and results.
62 of 116 games
Times shown in Pacific time (PT).
| Time | MatchupAwayHome | Model line | Market line | Diff | Proj score | Model total | Market total | Moneyline pick | Spread pick | Total pick | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| · | |||||||||||
| Delawarerank 124Middle Tennesseerank 142 | +1.5 | +1.5 | +0.0 | 25–23 | 48.4 | 47.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Florida Internationalrank 109Jacksonville Staterank 107 | -4.0 | -3.0 | -1.0 | 19–23 | 42.1 | 43.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Kennesaw Staterank 114Missouri Staterank 137 | +1.4 | +3.0 | -1.6 | 26–24 | 49.7 | 51.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Western Kentuckyrank 116Sam Houstonrank 136 | +1.0 | +1.5 | -0.5 | 27–26 | 52.2 | 53.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| East Carolinarank 85UABrank 117 | +4.9 | +4.5 | +0.4 | 28–23 | 50.5 | 47.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Over 47.5 -110 · EV 9.9% | ||
| Georgia Southernrank 92Old Dominionrank 113 | +2.2 | +4.0 | -1.8 | 26–24 | 49.5 | 47.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Colorado Staterank 106Texas Staterank 69 | -13.5 | -14.0 | +0.5 | 28–42 | 69.9 | 71.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Columbiarank 222*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Pennsylvaniarank 194*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -8.7 | – | – | 20–28 | 48.0 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Memphisrank 58Tulanerank 86 | +4.6 | +7.0 | -2.4 | 29–25 | 53.7 | 53.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Washingtonrank 42Purduerank 55 | -0.3 | -3.0 | +2.7 | 26–27 | 53.2 | 52.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | Washington +3.5 -112 · EV 6.8% | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| App Staterank 103Coastal Carolinarank 120 | +1.7 | +1.5 | +0.2 | 27–25 | 52.0 | 50.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Mississippi Staterank 22LSUrank 8 | -11.9 | -12.5 | +0.6 | 24–36 | 59.3 | 58.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Floridarank 14Texasrank 6 | -11.4 | -10.5 | -0.9 | 21–32 | 52.9 | 52.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Cincinnatirank 60West Virginiarank 70 | -1.2 | -2.5 | +1.3 | 30–31 | 60.8 | 63.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Kansasrank 46Kansas Staterank 39 | -5.1 | -4.5 | -0.6 | 25–31 | 56.1 | 55.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Charleston Southernrank 204*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Clemsonrank 43 | -44.2 | – | – | 2–46 | 48.5 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Pittsburghrank 40Boston Collegerank 89 | +9.8 | +6.5 | +3.3 | 28–18 | 46.6 | 43.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Over 43.5 -118 · EV 6.6% | ||
| Virginiarank 45SMUrank 33 | -7.6 | -9.5 | +1.9 | 23–30 | 53.1 | 51.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Ohio Staterank 2Indianarank 7 | +2.0 | +3.5 | -1.5 | 27–25 | 51.4 | 50.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Northwesternrank 32Michigan Staterank 65 | +6.8 | +7.5 | -0.7 | 28–21 | 49.3 | 48.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Florida Atlanticrank 88Armyrank 78 | -5.9 | -2.5 | -3.4 | 25–31 | 55.9 | 55.5 | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Ball Staterank 149Bowling Greenrank 139 | -6.9 | -6.5 | -0.4 | 20–27 | 46.7 | 45.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Hamptonrank 259*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Sacred Heartrank 231*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -14.6 | – | – | 16–31 | 46.9 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Chicago Staterank 260*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.North Carolina A&Trank 251*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -9.5 | – | – | 22–32 | 54.2 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Rhode Islandrank 166*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Yalerank 153*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -6.9 | – | – | 23–30 | 52.3 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Brownrank 188*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Princetonrank 177*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -5.0 | – | – | 18–23 | 40.6 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Central Connecticutrank 208*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Mercyhurstrank 254*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +6.6 | – | – | 33–26 | 59.6 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| New Havenrank 253*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Robert Morrisrank 238*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -8.1 | – | – | 20–28 | 48.6 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Duquesnerank 236*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Stonehillrank 237*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -3.1 | – | – | 22–25 | 46.9 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Georgia Staterank 96James Madisonrank 59 | -13.5 | -12.5 | -1.0 | 23–36 | 58.5 | 58.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Rutgersrank 79Marylandrank 72 | -6.2 | -6.0 | -0.2 | 26–32 | 58.2 | 56.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| The Citadelrank 213*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Texas A&Mrank 20 | -55.1 | – | – | 0–55 | 55.3 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Charlotterank 163Templerank 99 | -20.8 | -21.5 | +0.7 | 15–35 | 49.9 | 47.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Over 47.5 -112 · EV 6.2% | ||
| Massachusettsrank 143Buffalorank 138 | -5.2 | -6.5 | +1.3 | 20–25 | 45.3 | 41.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Over 41.5 -110 · EV 13.4% | ||
| Bryantrank 205*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Mainerank 221*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -0.5 | – | – | 24–24 | 48.3 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Monmouthrank 171*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.New Hampshirerank 220*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +6.6 | – | – | 33–27 | 59.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Merrimackrank 228*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Dartmouthrank 179*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -12.5 | – | – | 17–29 | 46.5 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Holy Crossrank 206*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Harvardrank 144*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -18.1 | – | – | 16–34 | 49.8 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Georgetownrank 248*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Colgaterank 156*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -22.8 | – | – | 10–33 | 42.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Daytonrank 234*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Butlerrank 218*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -5.2 | – | – | 24–29 | 52.8 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Morehead Staterank 265*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Davidsonrank 266*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -1.0 | – | – | 29–30 | 59.4 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Maristrank 245*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Drakerank 247*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -3.0 | – | – | 22–25 | 47.5 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| McNeeserank 196*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Northwestern Staterank 263*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +21.2 | – | – | 40–19 | 58.3 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Western Michiganrank 83Central Michiganrank 126 | +7.3 | +7.0 | +0.3 | 25–18 | 43.0 | 43.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| VMIrank 261*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Woffordrank 185*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -28.9 | – | – | 9–38 | 47.3 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Lehighrank 132*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Cornellrank 186*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +10.5 | – | – | 30–20 | 50.0 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| South Dakota Staterank 93*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.North Dakotarank 130*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +5.7 | – | – | 31–25 | 55.5 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Austin Peayrank 133*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.West Georgiarank 217*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +17.1 | – | – | 35–18 | 53.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Presbyterianrank 257*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Stetsonrank 264*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +8.5 | – | – | 32–23 | 55.1 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| UAlbanyrank 192*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Stony Brookrank 180*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -5.8 | – | – | 22–28 | 50.3 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Eastern Kentuckyrank 202*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Tennessee Techrank 140*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -18.1 | – | – | 16–34 | 50.4 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Lafayetterank 225*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Bucknellrank 249*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +2.7 | – | – | 26–24 | 50.3 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Idahorank 162*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Montanarank 128*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -13.5 | – | – | 25–38 | 63.2 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Idaho Staterank 148*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Weber Staterank 190*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +7.0 | – | – | 35–28 | 62.1 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Lindenwoodrank 210*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Eastern Illinoisrank 219*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -1.7 | – | – | 25–27 | 52.5 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Gardner-Webbrank 174*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.UT Martinrank 189*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -0.6 | – | – | 24–25 | 48.6 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Western Illinoisrank 195*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Southeast Missouri Staterank 173*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -7.7 | – | – | 21–29 | 50.1 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Gramblingrank 227*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Alabama A&Mrank 207*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -6.5 | – | – | 27–34 | 61.2 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Alabama Staterank 200*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Arkansas-Pine Bluffrank 232*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +1.7 | – | – | 28–27 | 55.0 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Alcorn Staterank 242*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Prairie View A&Mrank 199*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -11.5 | – | – | 23–34 | 56.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Bethune-Cookmanrank 246*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Mississippi Valley Staterank 262*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +10.4 | – | – | 32–21 | 53.4 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Florida A&Mrank 243*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Jackson Staterank 183*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -15.5 | – | – | 21–36 | 56.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Auburnrank 27Georgiarank 4 | -18.8 | -20.5 | +1.7 | 16–35 | 50.3 | 49.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Missourirank 18Ole Missrank 11 | -5.5 | -6.0 | +0.5 | 26–32 | 58.0 | 59.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Alabamarank 3Tennesseerank 13 | +8.1 | +8.5 | -0.4 | 31–23 | 54.6 | 51.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Over 51.5 -115 · EV 7.9% | ||
| Arizona Staterank 51Texas Techrank 12 | -15.3 | -14.5 | -0.8 | 18–33 | 50.9 | 48.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Georgia Techrank 66Virginia Techrank 47 | -8.1 | -10.0 | +1.9 | 24–32 | 56.6 | 56.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | Georgia Tech +10 -108 · EV 6.0% | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| North Carolinarank 49Dukerank 44 | -4.0 | -3.5 | -0.5 | 22–26 | 47.7 | 47.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Penn Staterank 31Michiganrank 26 | -4.0 | -6.5 | +2.5 | 21–25 | 45.6 | 42.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Over 42.5 -108 · EV 11.4% | ||
| Northern Illinoisrank 145Wyomingrank 131 | -7.2 | -7.5 | +0.3 | 16–23 | 39.6 | 40.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| UNLVrank 77Air Forcerank 82 | -1.6 | -1.5 | -0.1 | 23–24 | 47.3 | 47.5 | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Toledorank 84Eastern Michiganrank 127 | +7.5 | +6.5 | +1.0 | 31–23 | 54.1 | 53.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Akronrank 141Miami (OH)rank 110 | -11.6 | -9.5 | -2.1 | 19–30 | 48.8 | 46.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Towsonrank 203*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Campbellrank 165*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -10.9 | – | – | 24–35 | 58.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Villanovarank 175*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Fordhamrank 233*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +7.2 | – | – | 27–20 | 47.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Illinois Staterank 123*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Southern Illinoisrank 151*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +5.4 | – | – | 27–22 | 49.6 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Valparaisorank 256*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.San Diegorank 244*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -9.5 | – | – | 22–32 | 53.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Stephen F. Austinrank 125*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Nichollsrank 240*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +21.9 | – | – | 38–16 | 53.5 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Tulsarank 91Ricerank 118 | +3.9 | +4.0 | -0.1 | 25–21 | 45.7 | 45.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| South Dakotarank 119*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Murray Staterank 252*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +27.4 | – | – | 43–15 | 57.9 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Long Island Universityrank 235*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Wagnerrank 258*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +7.4 | – | – | 27–19 | 45.8 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Lamarrank 158*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.SE Louisianarank 164*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -1.1 | – | – | 23–24 | 46.6 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Troyrank 100Louisianarank 95 | -4.5 | -4.5 | +0.0 | 23–28 | 51.2 | 49.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Washington Staterank 94Oregon Staterank 50 | -15.5 | -17.5 | +2.0 | 19–34 | 52.7 | 52.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Northern Iowarank 159*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Youngstown Staterank 111*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -17.0 | – | – | 20–37 | 57.6 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Morgan Staterank 212*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Tennessee Staterank 239*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +0.5 | – | – | 27–27 | 54.5 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Arkansasrank 64Vanderbiltrank 54 | -6.1 | -6.0 | -0.1 | 22–28 | 50.6 | 50.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| TCUrank 41Baylorrank 37 | -5.5 | -5.5 | +0.0 | 22–27 | 49.1 | 48.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Florida Staterank 38Miamirank 5 | -20.6 | -21.0 | +0.4 | 19–39 | 58.1 | 55.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Over 55.5 -112 · EV 6.8% | ||
| Kent Staterank 146South Floridarank 74 | -21.6 | -20.5 | -1.1 | 12–34 | 45.8 | 45.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Nevadarank 112North Dakota Staterank 67*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -15.8 | -15.5 | -0.3 | 14–30 | 43.4 | 44.5 | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Abilene Christianrank 150*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.North Alabamarank 184*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +3.9 | – | – | 27–23 | 50.4 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Montana Staterank 98*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Eastern Washingtonrank 168*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +16.0 | – | – | 36–20 | 55.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Portland Staterank 224*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Northern Arizonarank 152*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -17.9 | – | – | 21–38 | 59.1 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Central Arkansasrank 191*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Tarleton Staterank 129*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -19.2 | – | – | 18–37 | 54.3 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| UT Rio Grande Valleyrank 178*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Incarnate Wordrank 172*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -4.2 | – | – | 24–28 | 52.0 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Mercerrank 147*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Samfordrank 216*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +13.3 | – | – | 31–18 | 49.2 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| East Texas A&Mrank 215*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Houston Christianrank 214*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -3.4 | – | – | 22–25 | 47.4 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Arkansas Staterank 102Southern Missrank 134 | +4.8 | +7.0 | -2.2 | 32–28 | 60.0 | 62.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Under 62.5 -108 · EV 8.5% | ||
| Kentuckyrank 24Oklahomarank 16 | -6.9 | -6.5 | -0.4 | 19–26 | 45.5 | 43.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Notre Damerank 1BYUrank 17 | +11.4 | +10.0 | +1.4 | 30–19 | 48.5 | 47.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Oklahoma Staterank 48Houstonrank 30 | -8.8 | -4.5 | -4.3 | 25–34 | 58.5 | 61.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Under 61.5 -110 · EV 9.9% | ||
| Elonrank 198*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Stanfordrank 101 | -27.8 | – | – | 12–40 | 52.7 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Louisvillerank 23Syracuserank 75 | +11.7 | +15.5 | -3.8 | 34–23 | 57.0 | 55.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Wisconsinrank 35UCLArank 28 | -4.8 | -3.0 | -1.8 | 21–26 | 47.1 | 45.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Navyrank 81UTSArank 71 | -7.6 | -6.5 | -1.1 | 23–31 | 54.4 | 55.5 | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Cal Polyrank 182*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Northern Coloradorank 193*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | -1.2 | – | – | 26–27 | 52.8 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| UC Davisrank 157*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded.Southern Utahrank 170*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +0.3 | – | – | 32–31 | 62.8 | – | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Louisiana Techrank 90UL Monroerank 154 | +14.6 | +14.5 | +0.1 | 36–22 | 57.9 | 57.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| San José Staterank 115UTEPrank 155 | +7.6 | +7.5 | +0.1 | 28–20 | 47.8 | 47.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Ohiorank 108Sacramento Staterank 169*: Several rating inputs are unavailable for this team; treat the line as degraded. | +13.4 | +14.0 | -0.6 | 31–18 | 49.2 | 49.5 | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | No Play Incomplete model inputs | ||
| Utahrank 10Coloradorank 68 | +15.8 | +15.5 | +0.3 | 33–17 | 50.1 | 49.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Wake Forestrank 34Californiarank 76 | +9.4 | +9.5 | -0.1 | 31–22 | 53.1 | 53.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| Fresno Staterank 73San Diego Staterank 105 | +5.2 | +7.5 | -2.3 | 27–22 | 48.8 | 46.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | San Diego State +7.5 -115 · EV 5.8% | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| New Mexicorank 61Hawai'irank 121 | +13.2 | +14.0 | -0.8 | 30–16 | 46.0 | 45.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | ||
| · | |||||||||||
| Nebraskarank 19Oregonrank 9 | -8.9 | -7.5 | -1.4 | 23–32 | 55.8 | 52.5 | No Play Below the edge threshold | No Play Below the edge threshold | Over 52.5 -110 · EV 11.0% | ||
Proj score is the published away–home expected points, which agree with the Model Line and the published total. Diff is model line minus market line. Market total is the consensus total when the total pick was decided. Picks require qualifying probabilities, prices, and input flags; a large point difference alone does not qualify. A star marks a team whose rating inputs are incomplete; N marks a neutral site.